– J. Rawls, “A Theory of Justice”, Harvard UP, Cambridge, 1971; R. Nozick, “The Theory of Rationality”, Princeton UP, Princeton, 1993; A. K. Sen, “Collective Choice & Social Welfare”, Holden Day, San Francisco, 1970. ↑
– Profitability ↑
– Distributed Profit ↑
– در سال 1389 خورشیدی دولت وقت جمهوری اسلامی ایران بر مبنای طرح ارائه شده به مجلس این کشور الزام به پرداخت مبالغی معیّن به طور ماهیانه به اتباع خود گردید، و متقابلاً دولت پداخت هر نوع یارانه معاف گردید. ↑
– توضیح آنکه، برای شکل گیری هر توی ساز و کار اقتصادی هماهنگ بین المللی، یکسان بودن تقریبی سیاست های اقتصادی اتباع جامعه جهانی مسئله ای کلیدی است، و روند اتخاذ شده توسط دولت ایران، در عین ایجاد دگردیسی در ساختار اقتصاد داخلی، موجب هر چه بیشتر بیگانه شدن نظام اقتصادی این کشور با روند اقتصاد بین المللی گردیده، و دولت مربوطه را از نقش آفرینی در نظام حقوق بین الملل تجاری – اقتصادی باز می دارد. ↑
عکس مرتبط با اقتصاد
– محمدرضا ضیائی بیگدلی، “حقوق بین الملل عمومی”، چاپ بیست و نهم، انتشارات گنج دانش، 1386 ↑
– مهمترین نهاد های یکسانساز حقوق خصوصی UNIDROIT و UNCITRAL می باشند. ↑
– Thomas Cottier, “From Progressive Liberalization to Progressive Regulation in WTO Law”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2006, 779–821. ↑
– P. J. Lloyd&K. M. Vautier, “Promoting Competition inGlobal Markets: A Multinational Approach”, Edward Elgar, UK, 1999. ↑
– Collective Economic Development ↑
– Public Economic Welfare ↑
– Thorough Cleansing of Economic Discrimination in International Scale ↑
– P. J. Lloyd&K. M. Vautier, op.cit. ↑
– نگاه کنید:Griffin, J., “EC/US Antitrust Cooperation Agreement: Impact on Transnational Business”, 1993, 24 LPIB, 1051; “EC and US Extraterritoriality: Activismand Cooperation” 1994, 17, FILJ, 353; “Extraterritorial Application of US Antitrust Law Clarified by United States Supreme Court”, 1993, 40 FBNJ, 564; “Extraterritoriality in US and EU Antitrust Enforcement”, 1999, 67, ALJ, 159; “Foreign Governmental Reactions to US Assertion of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction”, 1998, 6, GMLR, 505. ↑
– OECD, “Investment Patterns in Longer-Term Perspective”, Working Paper on International Investment No. 2000/2, OECD, Paris, April 2000. ↑
– UNCTAD, “World Investment Report 2001”, UNCTAD, New York, 2001. ↑
– P. Dicken. Global Shift, “The Internationalisation of Economic Activity”, The Guilford Press, New York, 1992. ↑
– OECD, “Globalisation and Local and Regional Co-operation”, Working Paper No. 16, OECD, Paris, 1994. ↑
– T. Levitt, “The Globalisation of Markets”, OUP, New York, 1985. ↑
– OECD, “Globalisation: What Opportunities and Challenges for Governments”, OECD, Paris, 1996. ↑
– D. J. Gerber, “Antitrust and the Challenge of Internationalisation”, 1988, 64(3), Chicago-Kent Law Review, 689; K. M. Vautier, P. J. Lloyd, “International Trade and Competition Policy: CER, APEC and theWTO”, VUW Press, Wellington, 1997. ↑
– A. Bollard, K. M. Vautier, “The Harmonisation of Competition Policy and Law under APEC”, PAFTAD 23 Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 9 December 1996. ↑
– Art. I: 2(a), GATS, General Agreementon Trade in Services. ↑
– Ibid, Art. I: 2©. ↑
– D. J. Gerber, op.cit. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Inter-Firm International Commerce ↑
– Einer R. Elhaug, “International Antitrust Law and Economics”, Third Edition, Foundation Press, New York, 2007. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Einer R. Elhaug, “International Competition Law and Economics”, Thomson West Publishers, Boston, 2008. ↑
– Lawrence A. Sullivan, Warren S. Grimes, “The Law of Antitrust: An Integrated Handbook”, Second Edition, Thomson West Pulishers, Boston, 2006. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Intra-Firm International Commerce ↑
– J. R. Markusen, “The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of Internation
جهت دانلود متن کامل این پایان نامه به سایت jemo.ir مراجعه نمایید.
al Trade”, 9, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995. ↑

– W. J. Ethier, “The Multinational Firm”, 101 Quarterly Journal Economics, 1986. ↑
– P. M. Mehta, “Foreign Direct Investment, Mega-Mergers and Strategic Alliances: Is Global Competition Accelerating Development or Headings Towards World Monopolies?” , Paper at pre-UNCTAD X Seminar on the Role of Competition Policy for Development in World Globalising Markets, Geneva, July 1999. ↑
– UNCTAD, “FDI Geography and the New General of FDI Promotion Policies”, UNCTAD, TAD/INF/PR23, 18 September 2001. ↑
– UNCTAD, “World Investment Report 2001”, UNCTAD, Geneva, 2001. ↑
– UNCTAD, “World Investment Report 1994”, UNCTAD, Geneva, 1994. ↑
– Supra. Note. 68. ↑
– Supra. Note. 65. ↑
– Strategic Alliances ↑
– Transnational Joint Ventures ↑
– J. Q. Barden, H.K. Steensma, M.A. Lyles, “The influence of parent control structure on parent conflict in Vietnamese international joint ventures: an organizational justice-based contingency approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 2005, 156–174. ↑
– Difficult Markets ↑
– J. Q. Barden, H.K. Steensma, M.A. Lyles, op.cit. ↑
– Partner ↑
– J. R. Markusen, op.cit. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Y. L. Doz, “Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: some critical issues”, In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (eds), “Cooperative Strategies in International Business – Joint Ventures and Technology Partnerships between Firms”, New York, Lexington Books, 1988; P. Dussauge, B. Garrette, “Determinants of success in international strategic alliances – evidence from the global aerospace industry”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 1995. ↑
– Supra. Note. 68. ↑
– International Competition Policy or International Antitrust Policy ↑
– P. Dussauge, B. Garrette, op.cit. ↑
– محمدرضا ضیائی بیگدلی، پیشین. ↑
– Y. L. Doz, op.cit. ↑
– Supra. Note. 91. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Robert E. Hudec, “The GATT Legal System: A Diplomat’s Jurisprudence”, 4, J. World Trade L., 1970, reprinted as “El Sistema del GATT: jurisprudentia diplomatic, 8 Derecho De Integracion”, Buenos Aires, 1971.همچنین از همین نویسنده، نگاه کنید:
“GATT or GABB? The Future Design of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade”, 80, Yale L. J., 1971; “Trade Policy Consequences of Canadian Foreign Investment Policy”, 6, Case Western Reserve J. Int’l L., 1973; “Retaliation Against ‘Unreasonable’ Foreign Trade Practices: The New Section 301 and GATT Nullification and Impairment”, 59, Minnesota L. Rev., 1975; “United States Compliance with the 1967 GATT Antidumping Code”, 1, Michigan YB Int’l Legal Studies, 1979; “GATT Dispute Settlement after the Tokyo Round: An Unfinished Business”, 13, Cornell Int’l L. J., 1980; “Restating the Reliance Interest”, 67, Cornell L. Rev., 1982; “Transcending the Ostensible: Some Reflections on the Nature of Litigation between Governments”, Melvin C. Steen Professorship Inaugural Lecture, 72, Minnesota L. Rev., 1987; “Reforming GATT Adjudication Procedures: The Lessons of the DISC Case”, 72, Minnesota L. Rev., 1988; “GATT and the Developing Countries”, Columbia Bus. L. Rev., 1992; “A Statistical Profile of GATT Dispute Settlement Cases”, 2, Minnesota J. Global Trade, 1993; “Free Trade and the Regulatory State: A GATT’s-Eye View of the Dormant Commerce Clause”, 47, Vanderbilt L. Rev., 1994; “Differences in National Environmental Standards: The Level Playing Field Dimension”, 5, Minnesota J. Global Trade, 1996. ↑
– Robert E. Hudec, “The Gatt Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy”, New York, 1975, second ed., Salem, NH: Butterworth, 1990همچنین از همین نویسنده، نگاه کنید:
“Adjudication of International Trade Disputes”, Thames Essay No. 16, London, Trade Policy Research Center, 1978; “Developing Countries in the Gatt Legal System”, Thames Essay No. 50, London, Gower, Trade Policy Research Center, 1987; “Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern Gatt Legal System”, Salem, NH, Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1993. “Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade”, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, in Jagdish N. Bhagwati, Robert E. Hudec eds., 1996, 2 vols.; “Essays On The Nature Of International Trade Law”, London, Cameron May, 1999. ↑
– Ibid. and Supra. Note. 96 ↑
– A. R. Guzman, “The Case for International Antitrust”, 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2004. ↑
– Nottebohm Case, Second Phase, 1955, ICJ Reports 4. ↑
– Economic Externalities ↑
– K. M. Vautier, P. J. Lloyd, op.cit. ↑
– Supra. Note. 68. ↑
– Su
pra. Note. 65. ↑
– Ibid. ↑
– Lotus Case (France v. Turkey), 1927, Pub. PCIJ, Series A, No. 10;همچنین نگاه کنید:
Compania Naveira Vascongado vs. Cristina SS, 1938, AC 485, 496–7;
و همچنین:
United States vs. Baker, 1955, 22, ILR, 203. ↑
– Barcelona Traction Case, 1970, ICJ Reports 248.در این خصوص قاعده ای حقوقی خاصّی در نظام حقوقی رومی – ژرمنی و جود دارد تحت عنوان:
“extra territorium jus dicenti impune non paretur” ↑